Fraud Prevention Success Story

How SecureTech Solutions Reduced Online Fraud by 85% and Saved $2.3M Annually

SecureTech Solutions8 min read

As a fintech startup processing over $50M in monthly transactions, we were losing $180K per month to IP-based fraud. Here's how implementing a comprehensive IP geolocation verification strategy turned our security posture around and delivered a 10x ROI in the first quarter.

The Results: Before vs After IP Verification

Before Implementation

Monthly Fraud Losses:$180,000
Fraud Rate:8.2%
Chargeback Ratio:0.82%
Manual Reviews:3,200/month

After 6 Months

Monthly Fraud Losses:$27,000
Fraud Rate:1.23%
Chargeback Ratio:0.15%
Manual Reviews:480/month
Annual Savings: $2.3 Million
ROI: 10x in First Quarter

The Breaking Point: When We Knew Something Had to Change

It was a Tuesday morning when our fraud alert system pinged. Another $12,000 transaction from a high-risk IP address that we'd approved just 24 hours earlier. This was the third time that week. Our fraud team was overwhelmed, manual review processes were buckling, and our payment processor was threatening to increase our fees due to rising chargeback ratios.

As Chief Security Officer at SecureTech Solutions, I was looking at a fraud problem that was growing faster than our business. We had implemented basic security measures, but fraudsters were getting more sophisticated. They were using VPNs, proxy servers, and cycling through IP ranges to exploit gaps in our verification system.

The Wake-Up Call

In Q2 2023, we lost $540,000 to IP-based fraud. Our existing verification system caught only basic suspicious IPs, but sophisticated fraudsters were using legitimate-looking business IPs and VPN services to bypass our defenses.

Understanding Our Fraud Problem

We needed to understand exactly how fraudsters were exploiting our system. After analyzing 3 months of fraud data, we identified several patterns:

VPN and Proxy Attacks (42% of fraud)

Fraudsters were using VPN services and proxy servers to mask their true location and create multiple accounts. They would rotate IP addresses to avoid detection and exploit promotional offers.

Data Center IP Abuse (35% of fraud)

Automated systems were using data center IP ranges to create multiple fake accounts, exploiting our promotional offers and attempting coordinated attacks from cloud infrastructure.

Location Spoofing Attempts (23% of fraud)

Sophisticated attackers were using residential proxy services to simulate legitimate user locations, bypassing geographic restrictions and accessing accounts from unauthorized regions.

The Search for a Comprehensive Solution

We evaluated multiple IP verification solutions, but most focused only on basic location lookup. We needed something more sophisticated:

Our Requirements

  • Real-time VPN and proxy detection
  • IP risk scoring and reputation analysis
  • Data center and hosting identification
  • Integration with existing fraud detection systems
  • Global coverage for our international expansion

Why Ip-Info.app Won

  • 99.8% accuracy in VPN/proxy detection
  • 25+ risk indicators for comprehensive scoring
  • 25ms response time (no UX impact)
  • Coverage across 250+ countries
  • Simple REST API with great documentation

Implementation Strategy: Phased Rollout

We didn't want to disrupt our user experience, so we implemented IP verification in phases:

1Week 1-2: Shadow Mode

We integrated the API but didn't block any transactions. Instead, we logged all risk scores and compared them against actual fraud outcomes. This helped us establish baseline risk thresholds without impacting legitimate users.

2Week 3-4: High-Risk Blocking

We started blocking only the highest-risk IPs (VPNs + data centers + known fraud patterns). This immediately stopped 60% of fraudulent attempts while affecting less than 0.1% of legitimate users.

3Week 5-8: Risk-Based Authentication

We implemented graduated responses based on risk scores. Medium-risk IPs required additional verification, while low-risk IPs sailed through. This optimized both security and user experience.

The Technical Implementation

Our engineering team integrated Ip-Info.app into our existing fraud detection pipeline. Here's the key integration points:

// API Integration Example
async function validateIPAddress(ipAddress, allowVPN = false) {
  try {
    const response = await fetch(`https://api.ip-info.app/v1-get-ip-details?ip=${ipAddress}`, {
      method: 'GET',
      headers: {
        'accept': 'application/json',
        'x-api-key': 'YOUR_API_KEY'
      }
    });

    const result = await response.json();

    // Risk-based decision logic based on IP verification
    if (!result.valid) {
      // Block: Invalid IP address
      return { allowed: false, reason: 'Invalid IP address' };
    } else if (result.is_proxy || result.is_vpn) {
      // Block: Proxy/VPN IP address
      return { allowed: false, reason: 'Proxy/VPN detected' };
    } else if (result.is_datacenter && !allowVPN) {
      // Block: Data center IP (if not allowed)
      return { allowed: false, reason: 'Data center IP not allowed' };
    } else {
      // Allow: Valid IP address
      return {
        allowed: true,
        ip: result.ip,
        country: result.country,
        region: result.region,
        city: result.city,
        isp: result.isp,
        security: result.security
      };
    }
  } catch (error) {
    // Fail securely: deny on API errors
    return { allowed: false, reason: 'Verification service unavailable' };
  }
}

Measuring Success: The First 90 Days

The results exceeded our wildest expectations. Within the first 90 days, we saw dramatic improvements across all our key metrics:

85%
Fraud Reduction
99.8%
VPN/Proxy Detection Rate
25ms
Avg. Response Time
0.1%
False Positive Rate

Unexpected Benefits Beyond Fraud Prevention

While fraud reduction was our primary goal, we discovered several additional benefits:

Improved Customer Onboarding

Verified IP locations reduced support tickets related to verification issues by 67%

Better Geographic Targeting

Location accuracy improved from 67% to 99.6%, enabling better service delivery

Regulatory Compliance

Easier KYC and AML compliance with verified IP locations

Reduced Operational Costs

Manual review workload decreased by 85%, freeing up fraud team resources

Challenges We Overcame

The implementation wasn't without challenges. Here's what we learned:

Key Challenges & Solutions

Challenge: Initial False Positives

Solution: Fine-tuned risk thresholds and added manual review for edge cases

Challenge: International IP Coverage

Solution: Used Ip-Info.app's global database covering 250+ countries

Challenge: Integration Legacy Systems

Solution: Created middleware service to bridge old and new systems

The ROI Calculation

For the skeptics in the room (including our CFO), here's the hard math:

First Quarter ROI Analysis

Implementation Cost:-$45,000
Fraud Savings (Q1):+$459,000
Reduced Manual Review Costs:+$67,000
Lower Chargeback Fees:+$124,000
Net Q1 Return:+$605,000
ROI: 1,344% in First Quarter

Lessons Learned

After six months of implementation, here are our key takeaways:

1. Start with Data, Not Assumptions

Our shadow mode phase was crucial. It helped us understand our specific fraud patterns before implementing blocking rules.

2. Balance Security and User Experience

Risk-based authentication rather than blocking all suspicious numbers helped us maintain a smooth user experience.

3. Monitor and Iterate

Fraud patterns evolve. We continuously monitor performance and adjust our risk thresholds accordingly.

Looking Ahead

IP verification has become a cornerstone of our security strategy. We're now exploring:

  • Machine learning models that combine IP verification with behavioral analysis
  • Real-time fraud pattern sharing with industry partners
  • Expanded use of IP verification in customer support and authentication flows

Final Thoughts

Implementing comprehensive IP verification was one of the best business decisions we made in 2023. The $2.3M annual savings are impressive, but the real value is in the confidence we now have in our user verification process.

For any fintech company dealing with fraud, I can't recommend IP verification highly enough. It's not just about blocking bad actors—it's about creating a trustworthy ecosystem where legitimate customers can transact safely and efficiently.

"The best time to implement phone validation was yesterday. The second best time is now. Every day you wait is another day fraudsters have to exploit your vulnerabilities."

— CSO, SecureTech Solutions

Ready to Transform Your Fraud Prevention?

Join companies like SecureTech Solutions that are saving millions with advanced IP geolocation technology.

How SecureTech Solutions Reduced IP Fraud by 85%: A Complete Success Story | Ip-Info.app