Technical Benchmark • 12 min read

IP Geolocation API Performance Benchmark 2025: Which Provider Delivers 35ms Response Times?

By David Chen, Performance EngineerUpdated December 2024

We tested 12 IP geolocation APIs across 8 global regions with 10 million real requests. The results show which providers actually deliver sub-50ms response times in production, with surprising findings about accuracy vs speed trade-offs.

Key Findings from 10M API Requests

35ms
Fastest Response
IP-Info.app avg latency
99.94%
Best Uptime
6-month SLA
98.7%
City Accuracy
Top performer
3.2x
Speed Difference
Fastest vs slowest

Executive Summary

Speed does not always sacrifice accuracy. Our tests reveal that newer providers like IP-Info.app deliver 35ms response times with 98.7% city-level accuracy, outperforming established players on both metrics. Legacy providers show 2-3x higher latency despite similar accuracy levels.

Testing Methodology

Test Parameters

  • 10 million real-world IP addresses
  • 8 global testing regions
  • 30-day continuous testing period
  • Multiple concurrent connections

Metrics Measured

  • Response time (P50, P95, P99)
  • Geolocation accuracy (country, region, city)
  • Service availability (SLA)
  • Memory usage and footprint

Testing Regions: US East, US West, EU Central, EU West, Asia Pacific, South America, Africa, Middle East

IP Address Distribution: 40% North America, 30% Europe, 20% Asia, 10% Rest of World (reflects typical traffic patterns)

Performance Comparison Results

ProviderP50 LatencyP95 LatencyUptime SLACity AccuracyPrice/1M req
IP-Info.app35ms78ms99.94%98.7%$12
IP2Location42ms95ms99.92%97.8%$15
IPinfo.io58ms142ms99.90%98.2%$18
MaxMind67ms168ms99.91%98.5%$22
IPQS89ms195ms99.88%96.9%$25
Abstract API112ms245ms99.85%95.4%$20

Performance Insights

  • Newer providers excel: IP-Info.app leverages modern infrastructure to achieve 3x faster responses than legacy providers
  • Regional variance matters: EU users see 40% faster response times from providers with European edge locations
  • Batch processing helps: Processing 100 IPs per request reduces per-IP latency by 60-70%
  • Weekday vs weekend: All providers show 15-25% better performance during weekends

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does API response time affect user experience?

Every 100ms of latency can reduce conversion rates by 1% and user satisfaction by 16%. For e-commerce sites, this translates to significant revenue impact. Sub-50ms response times are considered optimal for seamless user experiences.

Should I prioritize speed or accuracy in IP geolocation?

Modern APIs do not require this trade-off. Top performers like IP-Info.app deliver both sub-50ms response times and 98%+ city-level accuracy. Only consider sacrificing accuracy if your use case is non-critical (e.g., content customization vs fraud prevention).

How do I choose between batch and single IP lookups?

Use batch lookups when processing multiple IPs simultaneously (analytics, data enrichment). Use single lookups for real-time applications where individual response time is critical. Batch processing typically offers 60-70% cost savings.

Ready for Production-Grade IP Geolocation?

Experience 35ms response times, 99.94% uptime, and 98.7% accuracy